Rob Sherman Advocacy   
       Click on either picture for larger image and picture description.

"Fighting injustice, one victory at a time."

 

Liberal News and Commentary
Thursday, March 27, 2003

Q & A with a Mini-Trucker Customizer

      The debate over clear tail light lenses has become civilized and polite, since I made clear my objections to rude and obscene e-mail from some of those who object to my proposal to ban clear tail light lenses that do not contain red reflectors.  Today, questions and answers from an e-mailer named Joey who requested clarification on where Rob Sherman Advocacy stands on the issue.

Supporters bring you Rob Sherman Advocacy.
Click here to join them.

      Joey's text is in the same red font that he used to send it to me.  My reply is in the usual font.

My name is Joey. I'm 21 years old and been into MiniTruckin for about 11 years now.
 
Does this mean that you got your driver's license at the age of 10? 
 
My question for you is:  Are you going to try and pass a law that bans the customization of cars and trucks?
 
Just the opposite.  I love the look of customized cars and trucks.  I like the creativity that it shows.  What I oppose is the elimination of necessary safety equipment, such as the display of a red reflector that is visible at all hours of the day from the rear of all vehicles, including customized ones.  The red reflector is not there to protect the driver of the customized vehicle.  It is there to protect the driver of the vehicle BEHIND him by enabling that driver to see the vehicle ahead, particularly when weather conditions create poor visibility, such as on very cloudy days, foggy days and in winter when one's windshield may be clouded by steam or dirt spray.  Without the red reflector, such as in the tail light lens, the customized vehicle may be standing still, while the vehicle behind crashes into the improperly and illegally unmarked (no red reflector) customized vehicle.  The driver of the customized vehicle doesn't get hurt, because he was standing still in his disguised vehicle, but the driver behind gets maimed or killed due to the selfish, irresponsible conduct of the customizer.  That's what my campaign is all about.  Protecting law-abiding citizens like me from customizers who illegally endanger the public by obscuring their vehicles by eliminating the necessary rear red reflectors that normally are present in the tail light assembly. 
 
I'm just curious on your opinions on lowering and modifying the suspension and if you think it's a big concern?
 
I don't care what you do with the suspension, as long as you maintain proper, legal bumper height.  Maintaining proper bumper height is important so that, in a collision, one vehicle doesn't submerge the other vehicle.  Generally, when suspensions are lowered, the customizer doesn't bother to raise the bumper back up to the legal height, which I believe is 12 inches above the ground.  In fact, generally, the customizer could care less about how high his bumper is.  All he cares about is how cool he looks, regardless of how his conduct increases danger to himself and those around him.  It is because customizers don't care about the safety of those around them that people like me seek to enact laws mandating the preservation of safety standards.  What I do is not about opposing customization by mini-truckers or car customizers.  Rather, it is about preserving safety standards for the protection of everybody, including the customizers, but especially for the rest of us who could end up being victims of the reckless, careless, selfish, irresponsible conduct of those customizers who would compromise my safety because they think that looking as cool as possible is the only consideration, regardless of how much their selfish conduct degrades the safety of those around them. 
 
 
I was reading alot of your stuff and some I do agree and disagree.  How about try a law that bans Hyperwhite lenses?  Those are so annoying.  Ever have a problem driving home at night and see a bright blue light coming at you?  Really annoys the heck out of me.
 
There is a difference between things that annoy the public and things that endanger the public.  My goal is to eliminate those things that needlessly endanger the public.  As far as things that annoy the public, if a law was ever passed which banned that, I'd probably get life in prison because I perpetually seek ways to improve our lives by changing the status quo, and we know how annoying many in the public think that that is. 
 

Well thank you for listing to me and have a wonderful week!

 

You, too.

-Joey

         Rob Sherman          

P. O. Box 7410
Buffalo Grove, IL  60089-7410

A post office box is used because
the street address uses a curb mail box,
which is not secure.

Telephone:  (847) 870-0700

Fax:  (847) 870-1156

E-mail:  rob followed by the at symbol followed by robsherman dot com